How exposed is each program to AI-driven task automation? Lower composite scores = more protected from displacement.
The index measures each program's net exposure to AI displacement by balancing digital work intensity against two protective factors. Routine device use (iPads for transactions, computers for documentation) does not equal AI readiness. A child care worker who logs attendance on a tablet is not in the same risk category as a data analyst. The index captures this distinction.
How computer- and data-intensive is the core work?
Does the job require empathy, direct care, or constant interpersonal contact?
Is the work grounded in physical presence, manual skill, or safety responsibility?
Each dimension is computed from O*NET 23.1 survey data, normalized to a 0-1 scale. Program-level scores are employment-weighted averages across linked occupations, using the NCES CIP-SOC crosswalk and BLS OES May 2024 employment counts. A score of 0 means fully protected; 1 means fully exposed.
Data sources: O*NET 23.1 (U.S. Department of Labor), NCES CIP2020-SOC2018 Crosswalk, BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics (May 2024). Full methodology, limitations, and reproducibility details →
Search by program name or CIP code. Sort by any dimension. All 1,786 scored programs are included.
The full index is available as a CSV file for research and institutional use.
Methodology documentation: GitHub repository (dii_v2_methodology.md). Data sources: O*NET 23.1, NCES CIP2020-SOC2018 Crosswalk, BLS OES May 2024.